|
|
Millions of us have grown
up with fond memories of Christmas trees, bulging stockings, gaily
wrapped gifts, jolly old "Saint Nick," Rudolph the Red-nosed Reindeer,
yule logs, turkey or goose dinners, mistletoe, and Bing Crosby singing
"I'm dreaming..."
It's a major "Christian
holiday—a barometer for business; the most important commercial
season of the year in the Western world.
Yet, for all its importance
to millions, most remain completely ignorant of its true origins.
Where did we get Christmas? What about the original Christmas tree,
the exchanging of gifts, the yule log, Christmas dinners, mistletoe
and Santa Claus? You will be astounded to read the truth about Christmas!
In
a world filled with enormous problems, millions will take time out
to celebrate Christmas by traditional trappings such as gaily decorated
trees, brightly wrapped packages, and perhaps one too many at the
eggnog bowl.
What is
the meaning of all this revelry as millions plunge into
the annual floodtide of Christmas shopping, endless traffic jams,
neighborhood and office parties, Tom and Jerrys, blaring, monotonously
repeated Christmas carols, exchanging of gifts and all the trappings
of Christmas?
Most suppose
they are honoring the Lord Jesus Christ, the "little babe away in
a manger," as millions hear the oft-told tales of shepherds keeping
watch in their fields by night, the Magi and the star, Mary in the
manger, and the birth of the Christ child.
But be honest
with yourself. Have you ever really researched any authoritative
sources about Christmas?
And—what
difference does it make?
Probably,
you have never bothered to go to a public library, obtaining help
from the librarian with the card file, or using Reader's Guide
to obtain information from various historical and current sources
about Christmas. If you should do so, you would be in for
some great shocks.
You would
discover that the origins of "Christmas" are utterly pagan;
Jesus was not born on or anywhere near December 25th; and that everything
from mistletoe, "wassailing," exchanging of gifts, holly wreaths,
Santa Claus, Christmas trees, gaily decorated lights and bulbs,
eggnog bowls and Rudolph's red nose are merely heathenish, pagan
inventions of men, and have nothing to do whatsoever with
Jesus Christ of Nazareth or His birth!
Naturally,
none of this makes any difference whatever—IF THERE IS
NO GOD!
For, if
there is no God, then it is entirely man's own choice
as to how he worships whatever god of his choosing. But if God does
exist, if that great Creator God who gives us every breath
of air we breathe has NOT given man the prerogatives as to "how"
he will worship God—only left it up to us as to whether
we will acknowledge and revere our God—then it is another matter
altogether.
Are Pagan Customs All Right, So Long as Used in
Honor of Christ?
Americans
have always been smitten with the "quaint" customs of peculiar people
in other nations. Gum-chewing, camera-toting American tourists take
endless pictures, smiling at the "quaint" costumes, architecture,
music, customs and religion of other nations. But Almighty God sternly
warns His people not to copy pagans and heathens; wondering
how they worshiped their pagan gods (which are merely figments
of the imaginations of superstitious minds) and then adapt
those "quaint" heathen and pagan customs, wrapping them in tinsel,
whitewashing them, packaging them in gay colors, and calling
them "Christian"!
Notice this!
When God dispossessed the pagan nations before the advancing hosts
of Israel, He explained to His people that these heathens were losing
their lands because of the hideous abominations they practiced;
including every perversion, depravity and bestial practice known
to man. They worshiped nonexistent "gods" of the host of the heavens,
of the sky, earth, water, rain, the sun and the seasons. They worshiped
fertility, indulging in orgiastic celebrations and ceremonies
in harvesttime, in springtime and at the winter solstice, begging
their "sun god" to resume his northward journey across the sky,
warming the heavens towards spring and summer once again. The trappings
of their various and sundry religions included everything from ritualistic
worship of sex objects to human sacrifice!
God said, therefore,
"When the Eternal your God shall cut off the nations from before
thee, whither thou goest to possess them, and thou succeedest them,
and dwellest in their land;
"Take heed to
thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they
be destroyed from before thee; and that thou enquire not after their
gods, saying, 'How did these nations serve their gods?' even so
will I do likewise.
"Thou shalt
not do so unto the Eternal thy God; for every abomination
to the Eternal, which He hateth, have they done unto their gods;
for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire
to their gods.
"What thing
soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add
thereto, nor diminish from it" (Deuteronomy 12:29-32).
God strictly
commanded His people NOT to become inquisitive about the manner
of worship of these heathens; wondering what various accouterments
and paraphernalia of their worship service "meant," in symbol—becoming
curious about their "quaint" ways; their temples, decorations, feasts,
orgies, practices and customs—and then adapting such heathen customs
to the worship of the true God!
Yet, godless,
sinning mankind has done exactly that!
If a time
machine could suddenly catapult ancient pagan Romans, Greeks, Egyptians,
Babylonians, Persians, Huns, Scandinavians, Druids and others onto
the streets and into the homes of modern, so-called "Christian"
America, these pagans would immediately recognize the trappings
of "Christmas"!
While they would
no doubt see many modern innovations, the underlying symbols would
remain the same!
They would see
symbols having to do with the worship of life, fertility, sex and
reproduction, Nimrod and his mother-wife, orbs and eggs, logs and
trees, wreaths and berries, and the cheerful "ho, ho, ho" of jolly
old "Saint Nick."
Conversely,
if modern Americans could be catapulted back in time to some of
the ceremonies of the pagan Germanic races—the Scandinavians, Druids
in Scotland and Ireland, or Babylonians, Egyptians and Greeks—they,
too, would immediately recognize many of the trappings
of the pagan ceremonies of these peoples: decorated trees, wreaths
and berries, eggs and orbs, the "yule log," exchanging of gifts
and presents, roast goose and family meals, bonfires and celebrations,
drinking and kissing under the mistletoe.
But wait!
The modern American, Canadian or Briton, propelled backward
in time, would find some important ingredients of his modern "Christmastime"
celebrations missing if he suddenly found himself in the
streets of ancient Babylon, or observing a ceremony of the Druids
in Scotland. He would find, nowhere amidst all these familiar
trappings and surroundings, mention of Jesus Christ!
Conversely,
the ancient pagans, transported forward in time, would
see all the paraphernalia and revelry associated with their ancient
orgies to the sun god, and would perhaps marvel
that the professing "Christian" world had managed to subtly and
cleverly substitute all of these methods of sun worship
for worship of their "Son of God," Jesus Christ, rather than the
"sun-god," Nimrod, or "Tammuz." Others would think it a ceremony
to "Mithra," or Horus. None would assume the festival honored Christ!
But let's
understand, from history, the true origin of the trappings
of "Christmas," and see whether it is something Christians should
do.
The Yule Log
The origins of
the "yule log" are buried in dimmest antiquity— stemming from pagan
superstitions surrounding Nimrod (Horus or Osiris) and his mother-wife,
Semiramis.
Like the Christmas
tree, it has its origins among pagan worshipers of trees, and a
universal cult of tree worshipers, found in practically every nation
in ancient times.
However,
the term "yule" stems mostly from the tree worshipers of Denmark
and Sweden, for whom two months of the year, December and January,
were called "the former yule" and "the after yule," stemming from
the word "geol," meaning coming before or after the winter solstice.
The "yule log" merely meant the "solstice log," or the ceremony
of cutting trees out of the forest, and burning their bases and
trunks in the fires, while stationing the smaller trees inside the
homes, gaily decorated in commemoration of the solstice. Actually,
the word has its origin common with the English word "joy" and properly
means "noise, clamor; a season of rejoicing at the turn of the year
before Christmastime." The custom of burning the "yule" (pronounced
"yool") was apparently begun by Scandinavians who worshiped the
god "Thor," their "god of thunder." Universally, the Babylonish
mystery religion always allowed pagan peoples coming into the so-called
Christian church to preserve their pagan ceremonies, merely
adapting such customs and ceremonies into their new "Christian"
religion. So it was with the Scandinavians in their "yule" log!
As they burned their "yule" logs once each year at the solstice
in honor of their "god of thunder," Thor, it was only a matter of
time until the word "yule" would connote the entire season, with
all its festivities. Hence, the ancient English considered it good
luck to retain an unburned part of the log from year to year, thus
preserving, as it were, an unbroken chain of burnable materials
from the original "yule log" which might have been originally lit
by their ancestors.
From these
ancient pagan tree worshipers who celebrated their winter solstice
in honor of their pagan gods with noise, clamor, feasting and rejoicing,
the word "yule," first attached to their log stemming from
ancient tree worship, gradually came to connote the season,
and today is found in music poetry, as "yuletide," or the "Christmas
season." The origins and preservation of the custom are completely
pagan, and soundly condemned by the Eternal God
in His Word!
The Christmas Tree
Perhaps a greater
wealth of literature exists on the subject of tree worship than
any other pagan custom.
Primitive man
was utterly dependent upon the growth of trees in literally dozens
of ways. In the Tigris-Euphrates valley, a tremendous variety of
the palm tree gave man a great variety of food, shelter and even
clothing, woven from bark. In the northern latitudes, entire cultures
were built around the harvesting of trees from the forest. The logs
made homes and forts, and the lumber was planed and adzed into the
hulls of Viking ships. The tall pines and spruce made excellent
masts, and the gums and resins from their sap were used to make
the ships watertight.
Ancient man,
observing the growth cycle of trees, their obvious reaction to weather
and seasonal changes, their marvelous elasticity, strength and almost
endless utility—and bereft of the knowledge of the true God—ascribed
godlike qualities to these great plants.
But it was
not only superstitious "heathens" of the more primitive cultures
who ascribed godlike powers to trees! Even the vaunted Greek philosophers
Aristotle and Plutarch believed trees possessed reason
like human beings; taught that they had perceptions and passion!
Once having reasoned that trees "thought" and reasoned, it was no
great stretch of these ancient imaginations to see a direct connection
between the life of a man and that of a tree. Ancient tree worshipers
believed that, when the tree suffered, withered or was injured in
some way, a man's life, connected to the tree, also suffered sickness,
or even death. This idea is originally encountered in the Egyptian
"tale of the two brothers," which is probably more than three thousand
years old!
In this Egyptian
fable, one of the brothers allegedly leaves his heart on the top
of the flower of an acacia tree and falls dead when the tree is
cut down.
Rather than
the concept of an "internal" immortal soul, these heathens developed
the idea of an external "soul," which could be, in some
way, directly attached to the life of a tree.
In various cultures,
dozens of tree-worshiping rituals and beliefs are found. Sometimes,
a newborn child is associated with a newly planted tree, and it
was supposed the two lives were inextricably intertwined. On ceremonial
occasions, such as marriages, personal success, royal appointments
or betrothals, a tree would be planted—and the personal fortunes
and the career of the individual in whose honor the tree was planted
were supposedly interrelated between that individual and the tree.
Sometimes, certain
boughs or branches were selected and the individual drew omens of
life and death from the condition of them. In many cultures, including
those of Europe and early America, a man would put himself into
relationship with a tree by depositing upon it something that had
been in close personal contact with the man. This could include
fingernail clippings, bits of hair or articles of wearing apparel.
Like the black
arts of witchcraft and voodoo, in which it is supposed the piercing
of a doll with pins can bring about the affliction of an individual
far distant from the doll, tree worshipers believed there was a
real interconnection between human life and trees. Hence, they believed
it was possible to transfer disease or sickness from men to trees.
Bits of hair, nail clippings, clothing and other personal items
of the sick person would be affixed to the tree, or even inserted
into a hole in the trunk. Sometimes, the tree would be split, and
the patient actually passed through the aperture! The injured tree
would nevertheless recover, and it was supposed this was a sure
omen of the certain recovery of the patient. Customs have been preserved
in practically every part of the world of hanging objects upon trees
in order to establish some relationship between the gift giver and
the tree.
In 19th century
Europe, one could see bits of food, rags and other objects tied
to the branches of trees by supplicants. In India, a sick person,
supposedly tormented by a demon, would be provided a ceremony in
which a tree could be planted nearby wherein the demon was supposed
to dwell peacefully without further molesting the patient, so long
as its tree was left unharmed!
It was in India
that the Korwas hung rags on trees which formed the shrines of their
various village gods.
In early America,
Nebraskans believed hanging objects on the branches of trees propitiated
supernatural beings, procured good weather, and insured good hunting.
The inventor
of modern evolutionary geology, Darwin, recorded a tree in South
America festooned with various offerings, including rags, meat,
cigars and so on. Not only were libations made to this tree, but
even horses sacrificed before it!
Many Arabs had
sacred trees they believed were haunted by angels or the "Jinn."
They sacrificed to these trees, and it was believed the sick who
slept beneath them would receive prescriptions in their dreams.
Throughout Africa, in Burma, Central and South America and all over
the world, for that matter, there were various beliefs connecting
human life, various deities and trees.
In early Buddhism,
it was decided that trees had neither thought nor feeling and might
lawfully be cut down. But it was believed that certain spirits might
reside in the trees, though the trees themselves were devoid of
mind or thought.
African woodmen
placed a fresh sprig upon a hewn stump as a new home for the spirit
they believed resided in the tree.
Trees were planted
around graves in ancient Greece, and in Roman tradition planted
groves of trees were associated with the vaunted dead.
Anciently, the
races disinherited by the advancing Israelites, including the Hivites,
Amalakites, Amorites, Perizites, Philistines and others, worshiped
under the "groves." Sometimes, the trees were stripped of their
branches and limbs, though left upright in the soil with their roots
undisturbed. Then weird caricatures of their "gods" would be carved
on the trunks, and the trees left upright, as phallic symbols and
objects of worship.
On other occasions,
the upper branches were left intact, and the heathen worshiped among
the "groves," which are mentioned many times in the Old Testament.
These "Asherah"
were "groves" and usually located on a knoll or hill, and
left upright in the ground, among other larger green trees.
The 17th chapter of II Kings is an indictment against the Israelites,
explaining in great detail why the Eternal removed Israel
out of His sight, allowing Shalmanezer, the king of Assyria, to
carry them away captive!
Read it!
"And the children
of Israel did secretly those things that were not right against
the Eternal their God, and they built them high places in all their
cities, from the tower of the watchmen to the fenced city.
"And they
set them up images [pillars] and groves [Asherim]
in every high hill, and under every green tree:
"And there they
burnt incense in all the high places, as did the heathen whom the
Eternal carried away before them; and wrought wicked things to provoke
the Eternal to anger:
"For they
served idols, whereof the Eternal had said unto them, 'Ye
shall not do this thing!'" (II Kings 17:9-12).
Notice the direct
connection between the golden calf of Israel's original rebellion
and the later practices after hundreds of years had gone by!
"And they
left all the commandments of the Eternal their God, and made them
molten images, even two calves, and made a grove [trees
stripped to their branches and left in the ground, as upright obelisks!],
and worshiped all the host of heaven, and served Baal!
"And they
caused their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire,
and used divination and enchantments, and sold
themselves to do evil in the sight of the Eternal, to provoke His
anger" (II Kings 17:16,17).
When Gaal,
the son of Ebed, saw Abimelech approaching the city of Shechem,
he said, "See, there come people down by the middle of the land,
and another company come along by the diviners' oak" (Judges
9:35-37).
In the Hebrew,
the word meonenim in verse 37 should be rendered "the diviners'
oak." This famous oak tree was used by the diviners of the pagan
city which Abimelech and his forces destroyed, completely beat to
the ground, and sowed with salt as the judgment of God.
Tree worship,
in its many forms, is found again and again in the Bible as God's
people would adopt some to the filthy and pagan customs of the heathen
races with whom they came in contact.
Even in
ancient Prussia, the chief sanctuary of the old Prussians was a
"holy oak" around which the priests dwelt, and a high priest
who was known as "God's mouth." A prominent English name is "Holyoke"
or "Holyoak."
When a so-called
"sacred tree" died, in west equatorial Africa, it led to the abandonment
of the entire village site, and the migration of the inhabitants
to a different region.
When in Rome,
the sacred fig tree of Romulus in the forum withered, it caused
considerable fear and consternation!
From Asia, across
the land bridge to Alaska and the Yukon, came tree worshipers, who
believed their sacred trees contained the spirits of all sorts of
gods, and carved intricate caricatures of frogs, snakes, men and
spirits, eagles and other creatures into the trunks of their trees,
even adorning them with wings, legs and other appendages, setting
them upright around their villages as their sacred "totem poles,"
or Ashera!
No doubt,
a certain amount of pagan mythology stems from the simple fact that
the further earliest members of the human race migrated away
from the original centers of knowledge and truth, the more bizarre
and grotesque became their beliefs and customs, and the less accurate
their retention of original knowledge.
Hence, because
of the Genesis account of God placing His first two human beings
in the midst of a garden, and discussing with them the
two great opposites of eternal life on the one hand and
death on the other, as represented by two trees,
it requires no great stretch of the imagination to understand how
early Babylonians and others could come to associate spirit beings
(Satan appears in ancient art as coiled around the tree
of the knowledge of good and evil) with trees.
Perhaps
the earliest origin of the "Christmas tree" comes from the fable
of "St. Boniface" (Bonifacious), who allegedly destroyed the great
oak of Jupiter at Geismar in Hesse, Germany, and supposedly
built of the wood a chapel to "St. Peter." The legend says Boniface
(actually, an early English missionary named Winfrid), while traveling
through northern Germany, found a group of heathens at their sacred
oak preparing to sacrifice little Prince Asulf to their god, Jupiter.
Allegedly, Winfrid stopped the sacrifice and cut down the tree.
As the fable grew, the oak allegedly fell, not without protest,
and instantly a young fir tree appeared! Winfrid told the
heathens that the fir was the "tree of life," and represented
Christ!
Thus, one
of the first historical accounts of a so-called "Christian" missionary
adapting pagan beliefs concerning tree worship into some
form of "Christianity" is preserved.
The pagans
were delighted to believe in this new myth, which is an
almost identical replica of the ancient fable concerning the cutting
down of a huge oak representing the life and death of Nimrod
(Tammuz, or the sun god), and the idea that a young tree sprang
out of the ancient log overnight, thus representing the
rebirth or reincarnation of Nimrod as "Tammuz," or the god of the
sun!
Because the
people in Scandinavia were tree worshipers, it was only natural
that evergreen trees, their boughs and other evergreen plants (such
as the holly tree, ivy and the like) should become part of their
early "Christian festivals."
In this fashion,
the growing universal church allowed massive numbers of pagans and
heathens to come right into the so-called "Christian" religion,
while retaining their ancient superstitions, festivals and objects
of worship!
Long before
these pagans were ever introduced to so-called "Christianity," they
decorated their homes with evergreens and boughs.
The season of
the year?
At the winter
solstice of the sun!
Even the
Romans exchanged green tree branches for "good luck" on the calends,
or the first day of January!
|
Early Englishmen adopted this custom
for "Christmas," taking it from the Romans, who built the
first known towns and villages in the British Isles.
This
ancient pagan custom of Scandinavians and other dwellers in
the northern hemisphere came easily into the United States
in the very earliest stages of European immigration into the
New World. Finally, with the march of "civilization" westward,
as American settlers continued their practice of hewing evergreen
trees out of their forests and taking them into their log
cabins in the west, while the Indians of Alaska, British Columbia,
the Yukon and Pacific Northwest displayed their colorful "totem
poles," the ancient tree-worshiping cultures of both ends
of the earth were at last united.
|
 |
Almighty
God condemns these heathen rituals and customs in His Word!
But modern
Americans, utterly devoid of the awesome fear of God, use
only human reason and concern themselves with the nostalgic
memories of family, children and the "Christmas spirit."
Thus, they
attempt to justify the use of utterly pagan and heathen
customs in a so-called "Christian" holiday!
Trees are
beautiful. They are among the most important and useful of all the
plants the Eternal Creator has given to mankind. Perhaps nothing
looks fresher, more symbolic of youth, vigor, symmetry and beauty
than a young Douglas fir or blue spruce tree. So why destroy
this vitally important plant, which someday could provide enough
lumber for a home, fastening it to an upright stand, and bringing
it inside the home, while it withers and dies?
Indeed,
why?
The answer?
Custom. Tradition.
"We have always done it." Our forebears did it. Everyone else is
doing it.
Amazing.
Millions upon millions of human beings delightedly gather around
their "Christmas trees" each year, without the slightest knowledge
whatsoever of the utterly Babylonish, pagan, heathen and demoniacal
origin of the custom!
The Saturnalia
When Voyager
satellites began sending back astounding pictures of the planet
Saturn, with its impressive rings of debris and its many moons,
the planet Saturn was much in the news.
One of the
greatest festivals of the pagan calendar was that of Saturn,
originally celebrated near the end of December.
The festival
began, anciently, on the 19th, and extended for seven days,
which would include the 25th and 26th of December!
All classes
of the ancient Romans exchanged gifts during this celebration
of the solstice of the sun, one of the more common forms of gifts
being that of a clay doll. The dolls were especially given
to children, and it was believed they represented the original sacrifices
of human beings to the "infernal god." There was a tradition
that human sacrifices were once offered to Saturn, and Greeks and
Romans gave the name of "Cronus" and "Saturn" to a cruel Phoenician
baal to whom children were sacrificed at Carthage!
The Saturnalia
was finally instituted by Romulus, the founder of Rome, under the
name of "Brumalia," which meant "winter solstice." A solemn custom
of kindling fires has prevailed in parts of Europe, with the "yule
log" a prominent feature, just as fireside dinners and the exchanging
of gifts are still prominent features of modern American celebrations
of "Christmas."
Santa Claus
Early Dutch settlers
in New York brought the traditions of "St. Nicholas," the bishop
of Myra, in Lycia, to early America.
Though the cult
of this supposed "saint" in history is obscure, and nearly everything
that has come to us today is of a purely legendary character, it
is believed he was bishop of Myra during the reign of the emperor
Diocletian, and was persecuted and tortured for his faith. He was
allegedly present at the Council of Nicea.
Today, there
are nearly four hundred churches in England dedicated to "St. Nicholas."
"He" is the patron saint of Russia, the special protector of children,
scholars, merchants and sailors, and is sometimes invoked by travelers
to protect them from crime.
Strangely,
ancient art depicts this "St. Nicholas" of legend with three children
standing in a tub by his side. There is no certain interpretation
of this phenomenon, but one story says the three youths had been
murdered, cut up and sealed in a salting tub by an innkeeper, in
whose inn they had been lodging, and were supernaturally rescued
and restored by "St. Nicholas." Another legend told of his surreptitious
bestowal of dowries upon three daughters of an impoverished citizen
who was at the point of giving his girls over to a life of harlotry.
A custom of giving presents on the "eve of St. Nicholas" was finally
transferred to Christmas day.
 |
This is how the association of Christmas with "Santa
Claus" (merely an American corruption of the Dutch
form "San Nicolaas") occurred. It was not until 1823 that
an American minister and sometime poet, Clement C. Moore,
wrote his poem "A Visit From St. Nicholas," which was later
changed to "The Night Before Christmas." It is in this poem
the "jolly St. Nick" of today, with his huge pack of toys,
coming down the chimney, is described! As in all the other
trappings of Christmas, the origins of "Santa Claus" have
nothing whatsoever to do with the birthday of Jesus Christ,
are buried in antiquity, and belong only to the Babylonish
mystery religion.
|
Was Christ Born on December 25th?
How
did the professing Christian church come to arrive at the date of
December 25th for the birth of Christ? The earliest Gospel writers,
Matthew and Luke, began their accounts, not with the birth
of Jesus Christ, but with His baptism. Actually, the Bible carefully
conceals the date of Jesus' birth for the obvious reason
that God the Father and Jesus Christ the Son intended no special
celebration surrounding His birth, but did clearly sanctify
the occasion of His death; Jesus Christ changing
the old symbols of the paschal lamb, unleavened bread and bitter
herbs into the wine and unleavened bread of "the Lord's Supper."
This does not
mean that the birth of Jesus Christ was not the most important birth
in all of history, nor that it was not accompanied by great signs,
wonders, and miracles, or made important by the visit of the shepherds
and the Magi.
The timing
was not so important as the fact of Jesus' birth, that
a Savior had come into the world!
Many fables
and false suppositions surround the birth of Jesus Christ. Traditional
Christmas stories picture the Magi with their precious gifts standing
before the mother and child in the manger. Actually, as
Matthew's second chapter portrays, the Magi may have required up
to one full year, or, at the very least, several months
to make their journey, and by the time they arrived in Jerusalem
it was to "come into the house, [where] they saw the young
child with Mary his mother..." (Matthew 2:11).
Read the
whole chapter, and notice carefully that Herod inquired of the Magi
what time the star appeared, knowing they had required
some considerable time for their journey from Persia to Bethlehem.
Notice also that, in attempting to insure he killed Jesus Christ,
Herod commanded that all the children born in Bethlehem and the
whole region be slain "from two years old and under according
to the time which he had diligently inquired of the wise men" (Matthew
2:16).
Luke's account
shows the shepherds still "in the fields" keeping watch over their
flocks by night.
It has long
been recognized by historians and scholars that this placed the
birth of Jesus Christ sometime in the autumn, and not
in the winter, when shepherds would already have driven their flocks
into the sheepfolds, where they could be given shelter. Jerusalem
is in the higher elevations and enjoys cool nights, even in summer.
In the winter, temperatures fall considerably lower at nighttime,
and, therefore, the account of the shepherds coming to the manger
had to take place some months earlier than December—likely
in September, or at the very latest early October.
Then why
the custom of observing the birthday of Christ on December 25th?
December 25th
fell near the end of the ancient pagan seven-day ceremony of "the
Saturnalia," later changed to "the Brumalia" by imperial Roman decree.
This riotous
festival was in celebration of the winter solstice of the sun,
and honored Tammuz, or Nimrod, the "sun god." But notice how this
pagan festival gradually became inserted into the professing
"Christian" calendar!
The very earliest
known mention of December 25th as the birthday of Christ is in a
passage written by Theophilus of Antioch, probably around A.D. 183,
and is held to be very likely spurious.
That this
comment was mostly unknown is upheld in a statement by Origen in
A.D. 245 in his eighth homily on Leviticus, wherein he repudiates
as sinful the very concept of keeping the birthday of Christ!
The first valid
mention of December 25th was published in A.D. 354 by a Latin chronographer
who mentions nothing concerning any "festive occasion" but, falsely,
states the date of Jesus' birth as being "on a Friday and the fifteenth
day of the new moon" and links it to December 25th.
Many were speculating
toward the close of the second century about the date of Jesus'
birth, and another of the "antenicene fathers," Clement of Alexandria,
mentions such speculations, condemning them all as mere superstition!
Interestingly
enough, Clement maintained that many believed Jesus was born about
the 20th of May or on the 19th or 20th of April! Clement himself
leaned toward the 17th of November, 3 B.C.
It was not until
A.D. 242 when an author of a Latin tract called "De Pascha Computus"
believed that a connection began to be drawn between the festivities
in honor of the "sun god" and the birthday of Jesus Christ as "the
Sun of Righteousness."
The author
argued that, since the world was created perfect, it must have been
created in the springtime with all the flowers in bloom
and trees in leaf, and also at the equinox, with the moon created
as in its full stage. Continuing his reasoning, and following the
creation account of Genesis 1 (that the moon and the sun were "created"
on a Wednesday), he believed the 28th of March suited all these
considerations. Since he referred to Jesus Christ as "the Sun of
Righteousness," he deduced Christ must have been born on the 28th
of March, and claimed "private revelation" for this amazing discovery!
It was apparently
on such grounds that early Latins (in about 354) transferred the
birthday of Jesus from the 6th of January to the 25th of December.
The Latins called the 25th of December "Natalis invicti solis,"
or the birthday of the "unconquered son." Siprian called Jesus Christ
"sol verus," or "the true sun." Ambrose spoke of Jesus as "Sol novus
noster," or "our unique sun." Many other writers of this period
waxed eloquent, utilizing such rhetoric in supposed honor of Jesus
Christ, linking him to the "sun" of the heavens.
Syrians and
Armenians clung to the 6th of January as the alleged birthday of
Jesus Christ, and accused the Romans of sun worship and idolatry,
saying that their feast on the 25th of December had been invented
by disciples of Serinthis.
With the gradual
growth and development of the Roman Catholic Church, the "great
patriarchs" of Constantinople, Rome, Jerusalem, Alexandria, Antioch
and elsewhere expressed various opinions concerning the celebration
of "Christian" feasts (such as Epiphany and others). Several writers
from A.D 375 to 450, including Basil, Jerome and Epiphanius, contrasted
the new festival being observed around December 25th with those
celebrating the baptism of Jesus which was regarded "as a birth
according to the spirit." Apparently, the earliest acceptance of
December 25 as "Christ's birthday" occurred in the West and traveled
eastward from there. It was about A.D. 400, in Rome, that an imperial
writing included Christmas among the three important feasts of Christendom
(the other two being "Easter" and "Epiphany") and said theaters
must be closed on those days.
Christmas
was not made "official" in the so-called Holy Roman Empire until
A.D. 534. Bishop Juvenal did not officially introduce the festival
of the birth of Christ on the 25th of December in Jerusalem until
A.D. 440! At about the same time, the festival was established in
Alexandria. Actually, the grounds upon which the church introduced
the Christmas festival as a "Christmas feast" (which until then
had been completely unknown) are found in arguments over
adult and infant baptism!
The transition
from adult to infant baptism was proceeding rapidly in the East,
and had nearly been completed in the West. It was believed, previously,
that the divine life in Jesus dated from His baptism, which
naturally led to the regarding of Epiphany (celebration of Christ's
baptism) as the festival in honor of Jesus' "spiritual rebirth."
With the gradual adoption of infant baptism, this concept had to
be altered.
Therefore,
the earlier custom which had prevailed for hundreds of years, i.e.,
the linkage together with the physical, fleshly birth of
Christ and His "spiritual rebirth" on Epiphany, or the
celebration of Christ's baptism, was abandoned, and it
was now easier to separate the two events, celebrating one occasion
of His physical birth, or "Christmas," and His "spiritual
rebirth," or "Epiphany."
The ancient
British writer Bede proves that in Britain the 25th of December
was a festival long before the conversion of the British
Isles to "Christianity." He said, "The ancient peoples of the Angli
began the year on the 25th of December when we now celebrate the
birth of the Lord; and the very night which is so holy to us, they
called in their tongue 'the Mother's night' by reason we suspect
of the ceremonies which in that night-long vigil they performed."
As late as 1644, the Puritan movement in England forbade any merriment
or religious services on December 25th by an act of Parliament!
Their grounds were that it was a heathen festival, and
they ordered, instead, that the Puritans fast on that day!
Those who suppose
Jesus' birthday was known, that the events depicted in the early
chapters of Matthew and Luke were "the first Christmas," and who
confidently and ignorantly assume that Jesus' birthday was celebrated
on December 25th down through the ages, are utterly and totally
deceived!
The process
of gradually adopting the ancient pagan rituals of the Saturnalia,
on the 25th of December, and calling it the "birthday of Jesus Christ,"
span hundreds and hundreds of years, and is thoroughly condemned
of God in the Bible!
There is
no mention whatever in any New Testament passage that early
Christians took any note of the date of Jesus' birth, or held any
celebrations in honor of that day. Rather, the Bible carefully conceals
the date of Jesus' birth, for God never intended that His birthday
be an important "Christian" festival!
While the
FACT of His birth was an event of great importance, the date
was hidden!
Mistletoe
|
Mistletoe is a species Viscum, of a botanical family
called the Loranthaceae. The entire genus is parasitical,
containing about twenty species, distributed throughout many
parts of the world. The parasite commonly used in connection
with Christmastime is a native of Europe and England, forming
an evergreen bush thickly crowded with forking branches and
opposite leaves, and small, whitish berries filled with a
viscous semitransparent pulp.
In
ancient Scandinavian legend, mistletoe figured in the fable
about Balder (the sun god) being slain by the blind god Hoeder,
with an arrow furnished from mistletoe. It is the ancient
Scandinavian word for the plant which is retained in the English
pronunciation "mistletoe." Pliney writes that mistletoe was
held in reverence by the Druids, the pagan priests of ancient
Scotland, who prepared the pulp into a draft and used it as
a cure for sterility.
|
 |
In any event,
the use of a parasite for decoration in the northern hemisphere
was perhaps natural to these pagans, for whole forests of deciduous
trees lay naked of their leaves in December, and except for conifers
and holly, there were few green things to be seen. Along with other
winter-blooming plants of the northern hemisphere, mistletoe produces
its berries in the winter.
The Christmas Dinner
It is only
natural that festive celebrations stemming from ancient paganism
would feature lavish banquets. This custom was known in every ancient
society, from Babylon to Rome. However, both riotous orgies (as
we have seen, even the word "yule" meant clamor, or noise,
for the riotous nature of the festival) and abstinence,
such as fasting, are found in history in association with the winter
solstice of the sun.
In Eastern
Europe, roast goose is often served as a famous Christmas
dinner.
In Scandinavia, various forms of puddings or pastry are featured,
and in the United States the custom usually includes goose or turkey.
In
ancient Yugoslavia, the Serbs sacrificed and then ate roast pig
in honor of their "Bozhitch," their name for the sun god,
whose name in modern Serbia means "Christmas."
Traditional
Christmas dinners in the Western nations are only natural improvisations
of modern times, though these too have pagan origins. There is nothing
"wrong" with a family dinner! There is certainly nothing "wrong"
with a turkey dinner! But doing it at a specific time,
for a specific purpose, in association with all the paraphernalia
of paganism, is a different matter entirely!
The Exchanging of Gifts
It is supposed
our modern custom of exchanging gifts comes from the fact
that the Magi arrived at Jesus' birth site bearing "gold, frankincense,
and myrrh."
From this
tradition, it is supposed there were three wise men! Actually,
Satan the devil is a member of a famous "triumvirate,"
since there are only three archangels mentioned in the
Bible: Lucifer, Michael and Gabriel. God the Father and Christ the
Son represent duality in the Godhead, and the principle
of duality, not a three-way form of government or a triumvirate,
is represented throughout creation. (Write for the booklet God is
Not a Trinity, for further study).
There are two
sexes, two magnetic poles, and man is designed with two eyes, two
arms, two legs, etc.
There is
"the first man Adam and the second man Adam" (I Corinthians 15),
and duality is illustrated throughout the Bible. There
are the former and the latter prophets, physical and spiritual Israel,
physical birth and spiritual rebirth, the old and the new covenants,
and type and antitype!
Though Christmas
carols speak of "the three wise men," there could have been twelve,
twenty or even one hundred twenty or more!
It is supposed
there were three only because three categories of gifts
are mentioned. The amounts of those gifts are not specified.
Notice,
however, that these priests (they may have been priests of the religion
of Zoroaster) gave their gifts directly to CHRIST! In honor
of the newly born King of the universe, they paid homage to Jesus
as a King, by presenting HIM, not each other,
with gifts!
How ludicrous
it would have seemed if, after arriving in the house where the young
child was, the Magi had turned their backs on Jesus, began
noisily partaking at the Tom and Jerry bowl, slapping one another
on the back and singing drunken carols, and then began exchanging
their gifts among themselves!
Yet, that
is precisely what the professing "Christian" world does
today!
Completely
IGNORING Jesus Christ of Nazareth and His work, they frantically
rush about, withdrawing an annual savings account and spending a
great deal of money (which oftentimes they cannot afford) and exchange
gifts among themselves.
Finally—Whose Opinion Counts?
Over the years,
I have gotten a few pieces of "hate mail" from outraged mothers
and housewives who accuse me of "taking away Christmas" from their
children!
Plaintive
and wistful bits of nostalgic Americana would be included, such
as what Christmas meant in the memories of these young
mothers; recalling their childhood fantasies concerning Santa Claus,
the big family dinners with grandparents present, the excitement
of going to bed knowing the first thing they would do in the morning
was rush to the mantle to see if their sock was filled with candy
and toys; gathering around the Christmas tree to open gifts; or
even such memories as sewing together strings of popcorn and other
homemade Christmas tree decorations.
To these
few, I was the "Grinch" of the famous Christmas tale who "stole
Christmas."
If it is our childhood recollections and the opinions of babes
that really count, then I suppose all these arguments are
valid.
But if Almighty
God, the Creator who gives us every breath of air we breath, thunders
from His high heavens that these man-made pagan customs are an abomination
in His sight, then perhaps His opinion should count!
What about
you? Do you believe and know, in your heart, that your
Creator God does exist?
Is He real
to you?
Does it
make any difference in your life whether or not you please God,
or whether you please your little children with lies, fables,
fairy tales and paganism? God says, "hear ye the word which the
Eternal speaks unto you, O house of Israel:
"Thus says
the Eternal, learn not the way of the heathen, and be not
dismayed at the signs of heaven [such as the winter solstice!],
for the heathen are dismayed in them.
"For the
customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree
out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the
axe.
"They deck it
with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers,
that it move not" (Jeremiah 10:1-4).
In spite
of this plain command of God, millions of professing "Christians"
will journey into the forest, or go to the parking lots and shopping
centers where millions upon millions of young conifers are sold,
carrying them home and gaily decorating them with bits of tinsel
as if with silver and gold; or brightly colored orbs and bulbs representing
the ancient signs of fertility.
Millions
of parents will tell tiny children about "Santa Claus," little realizing
they are perpetuating an ancient myth, and concealing from
their children the real truth of God, by supplanting it
with a fable.
Instead
of being told about the Creator God and the soon-coming Jesus Christ
of Nazareth, who will rend the heavens and come to earth as conquering
King; or about King David, Moses, Daniel, Samson, or the apostle
Paul, millions of tiny children are led to believe that the kindliest,
friendliest, most generous and most interesting character
in the universe is the elfish "Santa Claus," who allegedly dwells
at the North Pole, making toys all year round, and then on Christmas
eve, supposedly visits countless millions upon millions of homes
within only hours, transported about by his reindeer, including
"Donner and Blitzen," with Rudolph and his famous red nose leading
the way!
Millions
of fathers will quietly sneak into closets and other hiding places,
bringing out presents for their delighted children to "discover"
on Christmas morning, and then lie to their children and
say "Santa" brought them.
Thus is the
ancient pagan custom kept alive year by year as young parents, equipped
with their own childhood memories, perpetuate the myth.
As unbelievable
as it may seem, thousands know better. But they fear what
people should say; fearing the scorn of other people
who might notice they have no Christmas tree or gaily decorated
lawns and eaves this year, and question them about it!
To these
people, it is clear whose opinion counts!
It is the opinion
of tiny children, or the opinion of so-called "friends" and neighbors!
When,
in the lives of millions of professing "Christians," will
the opinion of Jesus Christ and God the Father truly count?
Years ago,
it was said that one disgruntled little fellow, terribly upset when
he finally learned (as all children eventually do) there was
no Santa Claus, reportedly said, "Well, I guess I'd better
look into this 'Jesus Christ' business too!"
-End-
|
|