|
Did
we human beings come from bacteria from Mars? Astonishing claims
were made in August 1996 by astronomers who claimed to have identified
a meteorite which landed in Antarctica, but which had allegedly
come from Mars millions of years ago. Contained in the rock were
the fossilized remains of bacteria, or, as some said, "evidence"
of bacteria, meaning evidence that bacteria had contributed to the
decay of living material of some kind, which had been fossilized.
All major
media news sources quickly trumpeted the story. President Clinton
began pledging a renewed American effort in space. A NASA representative
began speculating about a manned trip to Mars by the turn of the
century!
Some major
news personnel, with coy smiles and laughter, began suggesting we
are all really Martians!
Is any of
this true? For if it is, you and I may as well chuck our Bibles
into the trash bin! After all, the Bible says God created the heavens
and the earth.
Our universe
is an awesome place. Countless galaxies exist, vast distances from
our own, consisting of hundreds of billions of stars.
We have
long suspected, and now know, that there are other planetary systems
held in the gravitational field of distant stars other solar systems.
Is all this in place for a purpose, or is our universe, our solar
system, and the earth itself merely an "accident."
Can we know
why the universe exists? Why is there life on this earth?
For centuries,
man has wondered, "Are we alone in the universe? Is there life on
neighboring planets?" For centuries, men have speculated about life
on Mars. Many of us remember the incredible national panic when
Orson Welles announced an "invasion from Mars" on a radio program
many decades ago?
Today, those
who believe in aliens who visit earth, UFOs, and life in outer space
are excited greatly encouraged by these sensational new announcements
of astronomers and the liberal media. Why are we humans on this
earth, a tiny speck in the vastness of space? Evolutionists have
not the remotest idea. To them, we are cosmic accidents the result
of billions of years of gradual change the descendants of amoeba.
Evolutionists
scornfully scoff at the Bible, which says, "In the beginning God
created the heavens and the earth..." (Genesis 1:1). "Where did
you get this God'?" they ask. "Where did He come from? Who made
this God?"
Believers
in God and the Bible might ask the same questions of evolutionists.
Many accept the "big bang" theory, which states that a primeval
"atom" of unimaginable size suddenly exploded, hurling matter in
all directions matter which became the stars, planets, moons, and
comets of our universe. Creationists might ask, "Where did you get
that gigantic hydrogen atom?" "Who made it? Where did it come from?
What caused it to explode?"
Can the
existence of God be scientifically proved? And if it can, does God
reveal to us why the universe and our solar system exist, and why
He created life on this earth?
Could it
be that our awesome universe, our beautiful world and all humanity,
were deliberately planned and created for each other; that there
was a great transcendental purpose?
Did We "Evolve" From Lower Life Forms?
Millions
do not believe in God. Evolution is no longer a "theory" to them,
but proof that life has been around for millions of years, thus
rending the story of Adam and Eve pure myth.
Millions
more, including many who go to church each week, are "theistic evolutionists."
They believe that a "God" of some kind used evolution as His creative
process.
Still others
insist that the Bible is the true record of the creation of mankind,
and that there is no conflict between the Bible and true science.
Is any of
this true? Can you prove it one way or the other?
Today, even
the television documentaries on wildlife and nature are filled with
statements about evolution. As children sit transfixed before the
TV watching killer whales, or hummingbirds, or elephants, the narrator
invariably speaks of how these creatures "evolved" into their present
form; how "evolution" provided them with their techniques for survival.
Few question
the smooth, professional voice of the narrator. Why would a child
of six, nine, or eleven question something as awesome as the wildlife
programs shown on television?
If they
have no alternative; if their parents have not taught them about
God, and about the glaring flaws in the theory of evolution, then
millions of children are fair game for the anti-God, anti-Bible,
anti-Creation forces in the media.
The liberal
media have made "creationists" into extremists by portraying anyone
who believes in God and the Bible as some wild-eyed fanatic who
might show up on the doorstep of an abortion clinic with an automatic
rifle blazing!
Of course,
anyone who believes in Jesus Christ would never contemplate such
a thing, but the modern media paints anyone who believes in Christ
with a broad brush. The so-called "Christian" conservatives are
downright dangerous, according to some liberals. Evolutionists and
agnostics scoff at those who believe in God.
Of course,
if evolutionists can do away with the concept of a Creator God,
then they destroy any basis for conscience, for morality, for the
difference between right and wrong, except as it is permitted by
decadent societies. They reject the judgment day, believing there
is no God Who will judge His creation.
"In the Beginning..."
In their patronizing
hauteur, evolutionists sneer at those who believe in God, the Creator
of all things, saying, "You can't have something from nothing there
had to be some origin."
Then, evolution
says, "In the beginning was the hydrogen atom. And then that atom
exploded. And then..."
But let's
apply logic to the evolutionists' claim. Where did they get their
"hydrogen atom"? How could it have come into being? How could all
the known matter in the universe have been contained in some one
great mass made only of hydrogen, which is but one of the elements
an odorless, colorless, extremely light weight gas which burns readily,
and which, when combined with oxygen, forms water? How could this
super-gigantic single "atom" have contained iron, copper, tin, molybdenum,
aluminum, sulphur, iodine, phosphorus, gold; all the minerals, metals,
and elements that make up "matter" ?
How could
this single, gigantic primeval "atom" have been somehow suspended
in "space"? What is "space"? Where did "space" come from? Where
does it begin? Where does it end? Is it endless? Evolutionists say
it "exploded." But how did it come to explode? What is an "explosion"?
What agent would have caused such a gigantic, universal explosion?
How could simple hydrogen, the so-called "building block" of the
universe, suddenly convert itself into the minerals and elements
that make up the billions of stars and planets?
Why would
pure hydrogen simply explode, unless there had been some exterior
agent which caused the explosion? By what law was it an explosion
instead of an implosion?
They don't
know. They have no answers.
But they
have faith! Faith blind faith in the theory of evolution is not
based on substance or fact, or even on logic, but is based on an
empty theory.
The "Faith" Called Evolution
Evolutionists
sneer at religionists and creationists, regarding them as uneducated
dunces who cling to ancient Hebrew fireside fantasies to explain
away the unexplainable. they view churchmen's creeds and dogmas
as but relics of ancient superstition. They themselves stand exposed
as the high priests of an empty, dogmatic faith.
Like high
priests of a mystery religion, these erudite teachers delve deeply
into chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, paleontology, comparative
anatomy, and nuclear physics. They deal with law, design, intricacy,
interdependency, symbiosis all of which present proofs of the existence
of God yet blindly refuse to admit there had to be a great Lawgiver;
had to be a great Designer; has to be some powerful Sustainer who
controls all these forces.
No individual
is more favorably positioned to see, with his own eyes, the marvelous
proofs of God than a chemist, or a physicist, or a geologist, or
any other scientist who studies into the material universe.
Of course,
not all of them are evolutionists. Many professional scientists
do believe in God. many have written brilliantly about the proofs
of God which are available in the universe, beneath our feet in
the rocks of earth, and all around us, in the immutable laws which
acts upon us.
Evolution
is more than pedantic science. Evolution stands exposed as a superstition.
And, like all mystery religions, the superstition of evolution was
born of motive.
There are
reasons why men choose to believe in evolution instead of divine
creation. Listen to this admission:
"It is the business of science to offer rational explanations for
all the events in the real world, and any scientist who calls on
God to explain something is falling down on his job. This is one
piece of dogmatism that a scientist cannot allow himself" (The Mystery
of the Expanding Universe, William Bonner, p. 119, emphasis mine).
But do not
scientists allow themselves just a little "dogma" from time to time?
A famed astronomer dabbled in a little dogma of his own not at all
unlike some of those of the universal church when he said, "There
is an impulse to ask where originated material comes from. But such
a question is entirely meaningless within the terms of reference
of science. Why is there gravitation? Why do electrical fields exist?
Why is the universe? These queries are on a par with asking where
newly originated matter comes from, and they are just as meaningless
and unprofitable" (Frontiers of Astronomy, Fred Hoyle, p. 342, emphasis
mine).
But why
is it meaningless to wonder why? The Bible answers the why of the
universe, why the world was created, why God put man here!
The Universe Had a Beginning
Though evolutionists
scoff at the Bible with its opening statement, "In the beginning
God created...," they know that the universe had a beginning.
They know
that our solar system is composed of matter, and that matter had
an origin.
What is
"matter" ? There are any number of "scientific" definitions. Matter
is anything that is an object. It occupies space and has weight,
or "mass." Yet, even electricity can be called matter, and matter
can be called energy in certain forms.
Since all
matter is subject to inertia, and will resist any change in its
motion, it is said to have weight, because it is attracted to the
gravitational pull of the earth.
Matter can
be liquid, solid, or gas. It can be organic or inorganic. You and
I are composed of matter of the minerals and the elements of this
earth like water, iron, iodine, and many others.
The smallest
particles of matter that can be identified as having specific properties
are molecules. Thus, a molecule of air, or iron, or tin, or sugar,
can be identified because of its structure; in the case of air,
because of its atoms of oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, and other, rarer
gases.
Some molecules
are composed of only three atoms. Others are very complex, composed
of dozens of atoms. A molecule cannot be seen with the human eye.
It is estimated that an empty milk bottle contains 27,000,000,000,000,000,000
(twenty-seven quintillion!) molecules of air. A tiny teaspoon may
contain 9 octillion, 940 sextillion molecules of water. That's 9,940,000,000,000,000,000,000,000!
Each molecule
is made up of atoms, arranged in intricate, law-abiding, harmonious
ways. A molecule of sugar contains atoms of hydrogen, carbon, and
hydrogen. It would require about one hundred million atoms stacked
atop each other to represent the thickness of the piece of paper
these words are printed upon.
Yet, the
atom is like a giant when compared to its parts.
Not so many
decades ago, scientists thought the atom was the smallest particle
of matter. But with the growth of nuclear physics, we have learned
that an atom is like a tiny universe in constant motion. Every atom,
science knows, is composed of a tiny nucleus (the word meaning "a
nut-like object").
The nucleus
within an atom is so tiny it would be like a gnat flying about within
a large building. Still, the nucleus contains about 99.95 percent
of the matter in an atom.
Outside
the nucleus, but contained within the atom, are infinitesimally
small electrical particles whizzing about in an area that is said
to be 50,000 times the size of the nucleus!
An atom is incredibly complex. It is organized. Atoms are
like bundles of organized energy made up into matter.
Scientists
consider the nuclei of atoms to be made up of even smaller "subatomic
particles." One of the "larger" subatomic particles, the proton,
is so small that it would require 2.5 trillion of them the equal
one inch!
Considering
such incredibly tiny sizes, how much do scientists really know about
atoms and subatomic particles? One particle, "discovered" a few
years ago, had a lifetime of only "one ten-thousandth of a millionth
of a millionth of a millionth of a second"! Yet, they tell us, this
is ten times the lifetime of similar particles. By the way, don't
automatically believe that statement just because it is here in
print. Actually, there is much disagreement about subatomic particles.
No "model"
or artist's sketch could adequately depict atomic structure. Up
until thirty years ago, scientists had classified about thirty-four
subatomic particles they claimed were "observed" on photographic
plates and in cloud chambers.
Nuclear
physicists have admitted there is no consensus among themselves
about atomic particles. Wrote Walter S. Houston in Frontiers Of
Nuclear Physics, "In practice the physicist uses whichever view
[of what elements make up atomic particles; the basic structure
of matter] suits his calculations. In many respects the physics
of elementary particles today is at a very real crossroads. It will
be fun to watch men struggle to adjust observation to theory, to
find the new observations that help build a more adequate model.
Curiously, although many people call physics an exact science,'
there is more confusion than certainty in the nuclear particle field
today" (ibid., p. 5).
With the
advent of nuclear physics, man learned how to "split" atoms how
to fission the nuclei of atoms, which causes explosions of mind-boggling
proportions.
Where does
this energy come from? Who put it there?
The nucleus
of an atom makes up 99.95 percent of its "mass." Noted physicist
Fritz Kahn said, "In contrast to its small size, the nucleus is
incredibly heavy. If a drop of dew were made entirely of nuclear
mass, it would be 130 trillion times heavier than it is now, composed
of molecules of water. A solid lump of nuclei the size of a lump
of sugar would weigh 24 billion kilograms; 26 million tons! That's
equivalent to five hundred battleships of 52 tons each!"
As mentioned,
the atom is like a tiny universe; vast in the relative size of the
nucleus, and the distances between it and the various subatomic
particles whizzing about at incredible speeds.
Kahn said,
"Despite the vastness of the atom, it is extremely difficult to
press one atom against another or to compress the orbits of the
electrons. Electrons revolve 6 times 10 to the 15th power times
per second, of 6 quintillion times per second around the nucleus.
A system with such a quotient for rotation is harder than steel,
no matter how small the mass or how great the distances. An atom
behaves like a propeller which makes a million revolutions a second."
What is
nuclear energy? Kahn said, "Since the protons are all equally charged,
they strongly repel each other. If the twenty-six protons inside
the nucleus of the iron atom were liberated from their bonds, they
would fly apart with a pressure of seven times ten to the 15th power
atmospheres [an "atmosphere" being the average air pressure at sea
level, or about fifteen pounds per square inch]. The released energy
corresponds to a temperature of more than 100 million degrees. Vehemence
of action and million-degree heat are the nuclear energy' we gain
by fissioning the nuclei of atoms, or, as it is generally expressed,
nuclear reactions."
Energy had
to come from somewhere. No physicist seriously believes the "yellow
dwarf" star that is our sun somehow invested the earth with all
this stored energy.
Said Kahn,
"Since energy is liberated when an atom nucleus is split, energy
must have been invested in the nucleus. We do not know how nuclei
originated. To combine 26 positively charged protons into a unit
requires an energy of billions of degrees of heat and a pressure
of more than seven times ten to the 18th power atmospheres. Even
in its fieriest days the earth could never have furnished such power,
nor could the sun have endowed the earth with such power."
Such is
the power and energy stored in matter that just one ounce of matter
contains energy equivalent to 625,000 tons of TNT! You and I are
composed of matter. All the physical universe is composed of matter.
One thing
is sure. The more science discovers about matter; the more technically
intricate the information available to nuclear physicists is, the
more law abiding and predictable they find our earth and all matter
to be.
To deny
that all this intricacy, interdependency, harmony, structure, and
complexity had a Maker, a Designer, is like walking into a forty-room
home with a huge library filled with rare books, several fireplaces
with the hearths already alight, an indoor swimming pool, and vast
kitchen with food on the stove, and claim the home had no architect,
no builder; that the books had no author or publisher; that everything
in the house and the house itself are the result of blind chance.
Matter Can Be Changed But Not Lost
All matter
the rocks under our feet, trees, water, grass, air, our own physical
bodies are therefore composed of energy arranged in different complex
forms.
When a nuclear
explosion occurs, a small amount of matter is released as a very
large amount of energy. Yet, nothing has been lost, only changed
from one form to another. The original matter has been changed into
energy. Since no new matter is being created, it is obvious that
matter had a beginning.
Our physical
universe is gradually running down. This is proved from the laws
which act upon radioactive elements; that U-238, uranium, is gradually
losing its radioactivity until, over vast periods of time, it becomes
Pb-206, or lead.
Science
does not know how matter, and therefore the universe and the solar
system, could have originated except by having some kind of a "creation,"
a beginning.
Science
cannot explain how elements of high atomic weight, including uranium,
just referred to, or thorium, are constantly giving off radiation
until they are changed into radium, lead, or polonium, which are
lighter elements. What is known is that matter is gradually losing
energ; that our sun and other stars are giving off radiation into
space.
Sir James
H. Jeans wrote, in his book, Eos, Or the Wider Aspects of Cosmogony,
"The universe is like a clock which is running down, a clock which,
so far as science knows, no one ever winds up, which cannot wind
itself up, and so must stop in time. It is at present a partially
wound-up clock, which must, at some time in the past, have been
wound up in some manner unknown to us."
Obviously,
all matter had a beginning.
No Past Eternity of Matter
With the
discovery of radium and the rapid progression of scientific knowledge
in nuclear physics, it has become known that at some time in the
past, "matter" simply did not exist.
Where did
the energy that is matter come from? Since all matter is made up
of atoms, and since each atom is like a tiny universe, with electrical
particles whizzing about within at a vast distance from the nucleus,
where did these perfectly arranged, law-abiding electrical particles
come from?
One of the
properties of matter is its solubility. Can it be dissolved into
another kind of matter, like sugar into water? Another property
is its density. Obviously, cork floats, while iron, extremely more
dense, sinks. Another property of matter is its form: gaseous, liquid,
or solid.
Dozens of
laws act upon matter. They are inexorable, immutable. Man cannot
change them. They are like living laws, since they are continually
sustained, and completely dependable.
Matter can
be changed from one form to another. Water can be frozen into a
solid, or evaporated into the air.
Science
did not invent these laws. Scientists, over hundreds of years, have
discovered laws which are utterly dependable, which act the same
way every time.
Atomic structure,
nuclear physics, and laws concerning the conservation of energy
demonstrate to us that there has been no past eternity of matter.
Matter, which is really energy arranged and compacted together in
various forms, has a definite beginning in the past! The creation
demands the existence of a great Creator!
Science
recognizes there are two absolute laws, called the "two laws of
thermodynamics," which act upon all matter. The first is the law
of the "conservation of energy," which states that while energy
can be changed from one form to another, nothing is lost nothing
is created or destroyed. The second law states that while the total
amount is unchanged, there is always a tendency for it to become
less available for useful work.
P. W. Bridgeman,
in his article, "Reflections On Thermodynamics" (American Scientist,
Vol. 41, p. 549), wrote, "The two laws of thermodynamics are, I
suppose, accepted by physicists as perhaps the most secure generalizations
from experience that we have. The physicist does not hesitate to
apply the two laws to any concrete physical situation in the confidence
that nature will not let him down."
All geological
and biological processes are governed by these two laws. In no case
is any new energy being created! Yet, during the remote past, at
the original creation of the earth, matter and energy were being
created. God designed, then produced flawless order, harmony, intricacy,
and interdependency (such as symbiosis) into our earth. Science
does not know the origin of matter, or why these laws operate as
they do.
Consider
the laws that act upon us; laws which govern all science; laws which
are like living forces, and which are sustained each and every day.
One of the
greatest laws, one with which all of us deal each day in dozens
of ways, is gravity.
As you read,
it is acting upon you. Your furniture, your every possession, your
own body at this instant is being held in the gentle grasp of gravity.
Pick up any object near at hand and drop it. It is gravity that
pulls it down. Yet, we almost never think about it. It is something
we take for granted.
|