|
Jesus
was born sometime in the late summer or early autumn of 4 B.C.
The
first time I ever made this statement to anyone I was viewed with
a combination of doubt, incredulity, hostility and outright pity.
"How
in the world could Jesus have been born before Christ?"
I was asked.
It
so happens that the present system in the Western Christian-professing
world of counting years either prior to or subsequent to the event
of our Savior’s birth was not established until the work of Dionysius
the Little, many, many centuries this side of the event.
In
the events surrounding Jesus' birth, God managed to move a whole
empire by causing the world leader of that time to establish an
entirely new government bureau (the taxing and census bureau) which
finally resulted in Joseph and Mary ending up in Bethlehem at the
time of Jesus' birth! Part of the requirement of the vast worldwide
census-taking was each family returning to the city of its origin
("And all went to be taxed everyone (into) his own city"
(Luke 2:3-4), so since the Bible claimed Joseph was of the lineage
of David (as both genealogical records in Matthew and Luke prove)
he had to journey with his wife who was in an advanced state of
pregnancy from Nazareth to Bethlehem, which is called the "city
of David." The census in Palestine took place in our faulty chronological
reckoning about the year 4 B.C.
From
early on, Mary understood that she was pregnant. She knew the meaning
of the interruption of the normal menstrual cycle; after all, hadn't
an angel actually told her this would happen?
Though
it must have been nearly unbelievable, and there surely must have
been moments of doubt, Mary's training and deep religious education,
including the quality of her own character and the deadly seriousness
of the impending persecutions and her knowledge of glances of those
in her own community, must have all been weighing heavily upon her
mind as she contemplated her gradually changing form, slightly swelling
belly, and growing breasts.
Even
though there probably had been many sessions between husband and
wife, poring over those prophecies they knew referred to what was
happening within the body of Mary herself, explaining why this shocking
transformation in their own private lives had turned their little
world upside down, they did not have perfect understanding of many
vague references later revealed by the gospel writers, and by Jesus
Himself.
Naturally,
Joseph and Mary had been living with the pain of growing notoriety
ever since friends and relatives learned of Mary's pregnancy. They
were fully prepared to accept it, as Mary's humble statement, "Behold,
the. handmaiden of the Lord," clearly shows.
Still,
it was tough, and they were as human as you and I.
Oh,
there were close friends and relatives who knew the truth. After
all, Elizabeth and Mary were cousins, and Elizabeth was carrying
the baby who would grow up to become John the Baptist—both remembered
the remarkable occasion when the two babies had reacted so obviously
when the two expectant mothers met. Joseph and Mary could spend
time with such people, away from the smirks and knowing stares of
the hypocrites.
But
suffered when friends talked behind their backs; they hurt when
former friends shunned them; they Probably had second, or even third,
thoughts about the tremendous burden they had assumed, as would
any other normal human beings. But they had the courage to see it
through.
It
may have seemed a cruel twist of fate, to be required by the Romans
to travel all that distance during the final, crucial month of pregnancy.
It is clear that Joseph and Mary were not acting out any special
predestined fulfillment of prophecy, or they would have seen the
predictions that Christ was to be born in Bethlehem, and would have
tried to travel earlier, at an easier time, and to have arranged
accommodations more suitable than the hasty, last ditch improvisation
of a manger.
Neither
could they have known that what had appeared to be a terribly difficult
trip at best, would end up with their being exiles in a foreign
country, waiting until Herod the Great had died.
Christ
was not born on Christmas. Those who do not yet know this, or do
not wish to know it, are either too firmly dedicated to tradition,
no matter how pagan, or are too lazy to bother with simple research.
Abundant
evidence exists which proves Christmas is utterly pagan in origin;
as pagan as belief in Dagon, Vishnu, Baal, or Isis and Osiris.
Jesus
was born in the autumn, though the exact date is kept carefully
concealed. Look at the eyewitness accounts, written by those who
were there. Even Herod didn't know exactly when Christ was
born, or he could not have risked a massive uprising by his brutal
edict to butcher helpless babies up to two years of age!
Most
people have never heard the true facts surrounding Christ’s birth;
and lodged in their minds is only a purely mythological tale which
exists only in fantasy and erroneous religious tradition.
The
traditional view of Jesus' birth, with the loveliest manger imaginable
on the face of the earth; sadly smiling shepherds leaning on their
crooks; the Magi, gorgeously arrayed in obviously kingly robes with
funny-looking crowns, opening up little gol—all this is repeated
endlessly in millions of Christmas cards, religious books, journals
and magazines, illustrated pages in Bibles, and on people's front
yards, rooftops, in their driveways, along roadsides, and in displays
in churches at Christmastime.
But,
the shepherds were not there at the birth. They came later. And
there is no reason to suspect that the shepherds and the wise men
ever crossed trails.
But
let's ask a few questions concerning Jesus’ birth. How did God manage
to convince the lowly and humble classes that in fact a Savior was
this day being born?
He,
did so by the most intricate collection of divine miracles, carefully
interwoven into the fabric of history, extending so far back in
time that it boggles the mind.
Few
realize that Michael the archangel spoke to Daniel and delivered
to him the longest single prophecy in the Bible (Daniel, the 11th
chapter is personal testimony from the archangel Michael) informing
him of a great struggle going on among archdemons, and perhaps Satan
himself.
These
were influencing the mind of the "Prince of Persia" in order to
bring about some disruption in Gods' plan to cause Artaxerxes to
allow the Jewish captives under Ezra to return to their homeland
and reestablish the religious state.
Though
it deserves a great deal of space, the miracles having to do with
the precise moment of Jesus' birth, the decree of Augustus, the
building of the temple, the beginning of His ministry, the decrees
of Cyrus and Artaxerxes, and many other related events are tightly
interwoven into a careful system of intricately fulfilled prophecies
to form a network of incontrovertible evidence: the fact that Jesus
Christ of Nazareth was in truth the Son of God.
All
the religious leaders knew, and the common folk believed intensely
in, Isaiah's prophecy, "Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear
a son, and shall call his name Immanuel" (which means "God with
us" in Isa. 7:14). They knew Isaiah had said, "The people that walked
in darkness have seen a great light: they that dwell in the land
of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined…for unto
us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall
be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor
[Wonder of a Counselor], the Mighty God, the Everlasting Father,
the Prince of Peace.
"Of
the increase of His government and peace there shall be no end,
upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and
to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even
for ever. The zeal of the Lord of Hosts will perform this" (Isa.
9:2-7).
But
how would God manage to avoid the contemptuous slander of "impostor"
heaped upon Jesus not only by His detractors, persecutors and religious
antagonists, but even by His own closest disciples and personal
friends? How would the common people, the meek, lowly shepherd and
laboring class be convinced utterly that Jesus was in fact fulfilling
the many prophecies of Isaiah, Daniel and others and was in fact
the promised Messiah, that "Prophet" who should come to deliver
Israel, and to qualify to inherit the throne of David?
First,
God sent a humble group of shepherds from sufficiently far away
that no one could claim collusion.
An
angel appeared to them and said, "Unto you is born this day
in the city of David a Saviour which is Christ the Lord" (Luke 2:
11). They were not. given any address, only a "sign" that they would
find the baby wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger; meaning
He would be so newly born that there would have been no opportunity
for either the purchase or the making of clothes for Him, and He
would still be wrapped in a soft blanket, not yet moved inside an
inn or a private home, but lying in a bed of straw.
Obviously,
then, the shepherds in journeying around the streets and the marketplaces
of Bethlehem were asking from time to time where they could find
a baby who had been born in a manger.
They
were no doubt quite excited about the vision they had seen, and
it is inconceivable that they were not elated with that combination
of awe, fright, and yet subdued joy over having actually heard the
voice of an angel, and seeing an overwhelmingly bright light seemingly
coming ,very near to them out of the heavens. Thus they fully expected
to find the Savior of mankind lying in swaddling clothes in a manger.
They probably asked any number of people, and repeated time and
again to the excited questions they were asked precisely what had
happened.
Finally,
with the question having been asked sufficiently about the town,
perhaps one servant at a nearby inn recalled that Joseph or a friend
had come, urgently begging the use of some basins and some heated
water; that one of the females in the kitchen had rushed off to
help during the birth; and that several of the women, had been exclaiming
about the fact that a poor woman had to be turned out in such an
advanced state of pregnancy, when a lot of other people had been
put up in more suitable accommodations, and were clicking their
tongues about the unfortunate happenstance that the poor lady had
given birth in a stable.
Actually,
the Creator was succeeding in announcing the birth through three
separate groups of individuals: the shepherds themselves; all the
citizenry and the townfolk they asked and who subsequently became
involved, and Joseph and his own family.
The
events of the first few weeks after Jesus' birth caused widespread
attention. It is evident that the Idumaean Herod (he was only partly
Jewish) was terribly shaken by what he had heard.
The
Bible says he was troubled and all Jerusalem with him (Matt.
2:3), and claims he gathered all the chief priests (who probably
were Sadducees) and scribes of the people together and demanded
of them where the Christ should be born (Matt. 2:4). All of the
scholars were aware that this very likely was the time of the birth
of Christ.
Pious
frauds and sincere scholars—astronomers, astrologers, seers and
soothsayers alike—were almost universally expectant that some great
event would occur at about this time, and were looking for
the Messiah.
When
Herod called together the "chief priests and scribes of the people,"
this was tantamount to the President of the United States having
a combined cabinet and Supreme Court meeting.
The
"'Supreme Court" of the Jewish nation was the Sanhedrin, and the
greatest religious body of the nation declared in unanimity that
Jesus the Savior would be born in Bethlehem, a city of David!
There
is no evidence whatever of the length of time that elapsed from
the moment the "star" (an angel, as shown by scriptures) appeared
to the Magi in "the east" (most authorities believe Persia) until
their arrival in Jerusalem; it could have been several weeks, or
even months.
Following
their interview with Herod, and his request that they "search out
carefully concerning the young child," they went outside, saw the
"star" again, and followed it until "it came and stood over where
the young child was" (Matt. 2:9). This was in Bethlehem, a short
distance over steeply plunging trails from Jerusalem. Contrary to
the assumption of millions, Jesus and His parents had found more
permanent accommodations following the hasty emergency quarters
in the stable, and the Magi "came into the house, and saw
the young child with Mary His mother, and they fell down and worshipped
Him . . ." (Matt. 2: 11).
That
night, the wise men had a "bad dream," a warning from God, and sneaked
out of the country without going back into Jerusalem. After they
left, Joseph also had a dream. "Now when they were departed, behold
an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise
and take the young child and His mother, and flee into Egypt, and
stay there until I tell you; for Herod will seek the young child
to destroy him."
Joseph
got up, hustled Mary and the baby, and any other servants or family
members who might have been with them, into their clothes, packed
and loaded the animals and took off that same night, hitting
the caravan route to Egypt, probably swinging further into Arabia.
They probably stopped at little-known campsites, avoiding the usual
water holes and towns or villages along the way. Little did Joseph
know that inadvertently he was fulfilling another prophecy which
said, "Out of Egypt did I call my son" (Hosea 11:1).
Herod
waited a few days, and then, in a fit of insane rage, "sent forth,
and slew all the male children that were in Bethlehem, and in all
the borders thereof, from two years old and under, according
to the time which he had carefully learned of the wise men"
(Matt. 2:16).
Since
it was the major trade and commercial capital, Joseph probably had
business, interests in Jerusalem. His own building trade required
that he deal from time to time with importers, distributors and
craftsmen who were located there. So he and his family may have
remained in Jerusalem up to about one year following Jesus' birth,
though there is no actual proof. However, the murder of the children
by Herod, risky even for a despotic king, offers some proof that
Herod suspected the child would have been about one year of age,
or even slightly older.
After
Joseph and family had been somewhere in Egypt for a time, another
dream occurred; an angel said to Joseph, "Get up and take the young
child with his mother, and go into Israel: for they are dead that
sought the young child's life" (Matt. 2:19-23).
The
following verse indicates Joseph's first choice as a place to live
probably would have been Jerusalem or its environs. "But when he
heard that Archelaus was reigning over Judea in the room of his
father Herod, he was afraid to go thither; and being warned of God
in a dream, he withdrew into the parts of Galilee, and came and
dwelt in a city called Nazareth; that it might be fulfilled which
was spoken by the prophets, that He should be called a Nazarene."
Being
a "Nazarene" merely meant He was a citizen of the city of Nazareth.
He is called "Jesus Christ of Nazareth" several times in the
Bible. Jesus was not an un-common name (only the Greek form of Joshua);
no doubt there was any number of individuals bearing the same name;
it was quite common to name children after various attributes of
God, or to include names of God (the prefix "El" and the suffix
"Yah" were very commonly applied) in a person's name. The real Jesus
was a Nazarene in the same sense a citizen of Chicago is a "Chicagoan,"
or someone living in Los Angeles is an "Angelino," or those in Paris
are "Parisians." It was not a "religious" title of any sort. but
a geographical and political term.
From
the time of the young lad's return with His parents from Egypt,
to the city of Nazareth, there is no further mention of Jesus until
the moment He is seen sitting in the temple, both listening to questions
and asking His own questions of the most learned doctors of the
law, and astonishing them with His understanding and His answers
(Luke 2:46-52).
Jesus the Creator— His Former Life
In
later years, Jesus was always making some "outrageous" statement,
the way the Pharisees looked at it. If something was true, He said
it. If something was false, He called it so. For example, Jesus
once said, "Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw
it, and was glad." What Jesus meant by this was that He,
Jesus, in His divine form was the very person who physically (through
spiritual transformation) had visited Abraham (Genesis 18)
and had related to him the reality of the coming of God's Kingdom;
that Abraham, because he had proved obedient and faithful, would
have a part in that Kingdom; that Abraham had known of the
necessity of a Savior to come ("rejoiced to see my day") and had
been glad.
The
religious leaders didn't get it. Jesus was thinking in "another
dimension"—the full knowledge and awareness of who He was,
of what He was, of His spiritual background and timelessness,
His great mission on earth, and His need to continually preach that
great truth.
The
religious leaders answered Him by a sarcastic, "You are not fifty
years old, and have you seen Abraham?", implying He was crazy.
Jesus then made another of those "outrageously" strange statements.
"Verily, verily, I say upon you, Before Abraham was, I am"!
When
Moses wanted to know what to say to the Israelites upon returning
to Egypt on his mission of leading them in the Exodus, he asked
God, "When I come upon the children of Israel, and shall say unto
them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they say
to me, What is his name: What shall I say unto them? And God said
unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: And he said, Thus shalt thou say unto
the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you" (Exodus 3:13-14).
"I
am that I am" can also be taken to mean "I will be what I will be"
or "I continue to be that which I continue to be."
"I am the self-determined one, the life self-inherent, the One
who is, and who always will be: the Eternal."(God is also called
the "Amen," meaning, the "So be it" or "So it shall be.")
The
Pharisees were familiar with Exodus 3:14, you can be sure. Thus,
when Jesus plainly said He was that one who had said those words
to Abraham, it just about snapped their minds. Forgetting all legality,
propriety, or due process, they flew into a blind rage, and ". .
. took up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went
out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed
by" (John 8:56-59).
There
are two other important scriptures relative to Christ’s preexistence.
"In
the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth." (Genesis
1:1)
"In
the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the
Word was God." (John 1: 1)
In
Genesis 1:1, the Hebrew word for God is Elohim. It is an interesting
word with a plural form (the im ending.) A little research
demonstrates that Elohim can indicate more than one person;
and can be taken to mean a family of persons.
Through
many portions of the Bible, Jesus reveals a family relationship
in both the family of God and the family of man. While Jesus
is called the Son of God, He is also called the Son of man, the
Creator and Author of human life, the first-begotten from all humankind,
the "firstborn among many brethren" (Rom. 8:29), the Captain and
Author of our salvation, and the soon-coming King of Kings and Lord
of Lords.
Notice
that there is duality everywhere evidenced, not only in God's creation,
but throughout the Bible when members of the Godhead are revealed.
Elohim
means more than one, and, while not necessarily limiting
the number, many other texts prove there was the Father (who no
man has ever seen at any time) and the Son.
Therefore,
in our modern English language, the beginning text of the Bible
would be more understandable if it were written thus: "In the beginning,
the family of God, consisting of the Father and the Son, created
the heaven and the earth!'
John
1: 1 is the second significant place in the Bible where the phrase
"In the beginning . . ." is used.
In
the beginning was the word, and the word was with God, and
the word was God. The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made
that was made" (John 1: 1-3).
Here,
the Greek word, logos (word) is used in reference to Christ.
None of the other disciples who wrote of Jesus' life (Matthew, Mark
and Luke) utilized "logos" in reference to Christ.
The
Greek word seems to have a double meaning, referring to both "reason"
and "speech." However, the idea John obviously had in mind is to
convey the clearest meaning of those many long talks he and Jesus
had privately, wherein Jesus conveyed to him the deepest secrets
and mysteries of Jesus' own preexistent state.
You
have the feeling, in reading the first chapter of John, that John
is speaking from a great deal of experience, trying to recall words
which Jesus Himself very likely used.
John's
first chapter closely corroborates the fact that the Hebrew word
elohim in Genesis 1: 1 means that there was more, than one
member of the God family involved in the creating!
The
"Word" was, then, the executive member of the Godhead, One
of whom the Bible says "all things were made by him"!
Perhaps
the clearest scripture absolutely proving that the Jesus Christ
of the New Testament was the same Being who was the Eternal Creator
of the Old Testament, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel, is Colossians
1: 16: "For by him were all things created, that are in heaven,
and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones,
or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created
by him, and for him."
These
verses very plainly show that this same Being who made all things,
"was in the world and the world was made by him, and the
world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him
not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become
the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: which were
born [begotten] not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor
of the will of man, but of God." (John 1: 10-13)
This
unmistakable reference to Jesus Christ of Nazareth clearly shows,
without any interpretation or exegesis, that the creator being who
is called "God" (Elohim or YHWH) in the Old Testament is
the same individual who became the Jesus Christ of the New Testament!
Notice
the next words, "And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among
us (and we beheld his glory, glory as of the only begotten of the
Father), full of grace and truth" (John 1:14).
The
Word did the creating, and the Word "became flesh." What could be
simpler than that?
The
New Testament is rife with scriptures concerning Jesus' attempts
to convey the message which the Father gave Him. He said He spoke
only as the Father inspired Him, spoke only what the Father
gave Him. Jesus continually said He came to reveal the Father:
He prayed to His Father, said He was returning to His Father, and
showed, continually, a Father-Son relationship
There
is a great deal of further proof throughout the Bible on the prehuman
origins of Jesus Christ! For example, He is called that "Rock" which
followed the children of Israel in the wilderness ("And did all
drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual
Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ" I Cor. 10:4);
and is referred to as that "Rock" in Deuteronomy: "He is the Rock,
his work is perfect" (Deut. 32:4).
The
personage who "emptied himself" and "became of no repute," and "was
made flesh," born of the virgin Mary to become the baby Jesus in
Bethlehem, was the same individual who created Adam, who
saved Noah, who appeared to Abraham, who wrestled in the dust of
the earth with Jacob, who called and spoke to Moses out of a fiery
bush and a cloud, who parted the Red Sea and who spoke directly
to His prophets, from the patriarchs prior to the flood on down
to Elijah and others. Jesus Christ of Nazareth was the same personality
of the Godhead or God family who wrote with His own finger the Ten
Commandments and who ruled Israel.
The
Bible absolutely proves the fact that Jesus Christ of the
New Testament is the same person as the God of the Old Testament!
|